Nasgaweb Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home » Nasgaweb Forums » Training
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Oly lifts.....Sean/Dan/Peter/etc...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Database

scottishheavyphotographs.com Old Celt Equipment

Oly lifts.....Sean/Dan/Peter/etc...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Oly lifts.....Sean/Dan/Peter/etc...
    Posted: 3/09/11 at 3:03am
Ok, this is something that I've been pondering for a while now, not that it affects me at all because I don't snatch or c&j with any regularity anyway, but perhaps it will be enlightening for me.  

Having watched pretty much all the videos that anyone puts up, I obv pay closer attention to my competition, which for this discussion is Sean and Dan.  I notice in their oly lifts, that they both have significant jumping out of the feet to get under the weight (TRob too now that I think about it).  I notice this with football players too in watching videos (and I suspect that ego is the reason they do it, to say they "lifted" more weight), and never oly lifters, but I digress.    

As athletes, wouldn't staying in a more athletic, or even staying in a position that we actually use on the field have more direct carryover?

I'm gonna pick on Dan, since he's far and away the strongest at these lifts on the board.  The images below are from Dan's 305 hang snatch.  



Picture 1 is a miss, and picture 2 is a successful snatch.  Both pictures are at the top of the pull.  Realizing that both pulls are similar in height (although I think the argument could be made that picture 1 is pulled higher), and noticing where Dan's feet are at, I would think that picture 1 would have much more carryover for sport.  That is a much more realistic position, especially for us in something like WOB/Sheaf/Caber.  

I understand that we all want to lift more weight, but if you're actually pulling something higher on a miss than a make, then wouldn't it be more beneficial to continue something like that?  And I'm not advocating not doing cleans or snatches, more just not jumping your feet out to such a great degree.  Or maybe I'm totally off and should try/start to clean and start jumping my feet out?  Maybe that's why my clean always sucked, lol.  

Thoughts?
Back to Top
adam keep View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 8/13/10
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adam keep Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 3:34am
I'm not the guys this was meant for, but I did train strictly oly lifting when I was on the Air Force team a couple years ago.

One of the best assistance lifts for me in my oly lifts were really heavy high pulls. I would set up as normal, same 1st 2nd and 3rd pull as a clean  but I would finish with a huge pull of the arms at the end and then just let go from there. I know you know what a high pull is of course, but that is what Dan's first lift/miss looked like to me. I do think the high pull has a better carry over to sport like you said though. It's easier on the joints because you don't have to catch it, it takes less technique to finish, bigger loads are used, and it really is more sport specific than finishing the clean or snatch.

When i get back to home station in England (RAF Mildenhall) I will be doing more high pulls for sure!
105kg pro strongman
Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 3:52am
Thanks Adam, this was meant for everyone I just wanted to make sure I got those guys input, since they are the ones that do it (sans Peter maybe).  I assume as an oly lifter specifically, you did not. 

I obv agree with what you said, as stated in my post, but I'm guessing those guys don't since they aren't doing it.  So I'm left wondering why.  Maybe I'm missing something and I want to hear all sides. 


Back to Top
adam keep View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 8/13/10
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adam keep Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 4:07am
Word up! I love the high pulls though and I did them all the time! I didn't have time for the 6 days a week program so i had to cram in the work 3 days a week. My sessions usually went cleans with 90% or so, high pulls with 110-115%, clean deadlift with shrug with 140-150%, squats with 150% of my clean 1RM. Snatch days were the same.

I saw that they didn't do high pulls either. I think people just see the clean more often because it was one of those exercises we were taught in school and it has stuck, haha!
105kg pro strongman
Back to Top
CHAD View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
Dangerously Anabolic

Joined: 2/04/05
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CHAD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 4:49am
That's a nice outfit, there.

It's the "catch" of the Olympic lifts keeps you honest.  Without something like a tendo, you just aren't going to have the speed, rep-to-rep, if you use pulls.  And this speed is why one does the olifts, to begin with.  Otherwise deadlifts and dynamic squatting with bands may be a better way to go.

Now, is that wide landing a good thing?  I wouldn't think so.  After my knee took a crap (which made me have to stop squat snatching and cleaning), I had to switch to the split style. 
Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:17am
I can see that Josh, with regard to the speed.  Which is why I said I wasn't advocating not doing them, just mostly wondering why they do the wide jump out thing. 

Is the jump out is just an ugly way of getting under the bar then?  Would that really give you a good indication of said speed? 

For example, in the pics I posted above, Dan pulls the bar to similar height, with presumably similar speed, but is able to catch one due the jump out, so he isn't really any faster, and isn't any stronger, even though one is a miss and one is a make, right?
Back to Top
CHAD View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
Dangerously Anabolic

Joined: 2/04/05
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CHAD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:33am
The jump out is not ideal, no.  The answer is to not do that, NOT to do high pulls.  Targeted high pulls do have their place, though.

A missed power clean should be a squat or split clean, IMO.  For safety.
Back to Top
Pingleton View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Highland Games' virtually straight legs

Joined: 11/28/06
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pingleton Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:33am

Craig,

I am largely with Josh.  FWIW, the wide lateral leg split is not something I like to see, particularly on snatches, where the solution/alernative is a front to back split of the legs, which is far superior for several reasons. 

The reason for the wide split is obviously to get under the bar, and the legs are spread instead of going into a quarter squat or half squat because (i) it is probably easier/more natural to do without practice and (ii) this style doesn't entail actually reversing directions and squatting DOWN under the bar, which is the proper way to do it if you have to. 

I am sure I have done something like this from time to time in the past when I am trying to catch the bar high (and therefore don't really initiate a squat phase) but I don't quite pull the bar high enough.  PR attempts aside, I personally believe it is preferable for a thrower to use slightly less weight and pull it high enough to catch on slightly bent legs or perhaps in a quarter squat.  The snatch can either be done the same or caught in a jerk-depth split.  The wide lateral split should really be avoided.

As Josh noted and has been discussed before several times, I personally prefer to catch my lifts for the reasons mentioned, but many other very serious athletes have done otherwise.  The key is to be honest about bar height and bar speed vs. the weight lifted.

BTW, this is why I alway note HOW I do my lifts - catching a clean on "virtually straight legs" vs. "in a half squat" are quite different things with a given weight.


We do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.



    - George Bernard Shaw



Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:37am
Originally posted by Josh Roslik Josh Roslik wrote:

The jump out is not ideal, no.  The answer is to not do that, NOT to do high pulls.  Targeted high pulls do have their place, though.


This is precisely what I was asking in my original post. 

I was not advocating doing something else instead (although for some that may be an alternative). 

Having said that, they DO do that, so my question to them would be why. 
Back to Top
Pingleton View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Highland Games' virtually straight legs

Joined: 11/28/06
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pingleton Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:38am

Originally posted by Josh Roslik Josh Roslik wrote:


A missed power clean should be a squat or split clean, IMO. 

Exactly!  The first time I ever cleaned 300 lbs., when I was 19, it was an ATG full clean, which I had never even attempted before, simply because I wasn't strong enough to pull it higher but was fast enough and aggressive enough to get under it.  I was power cleaning 285 very regularly at that point catching the bar in a quarter squat.


We do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.



    - George Bernard Shaw



Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:41am
Originally posted by Pingleton Pingleton wrote:

Craig,

I am largely with Josh.  FWIW, the wide lateral leg split is not something I like to see, particularly on snatches, where the solution/alernative is a front to back split of the legs, which is far superior for several reasons. 

The reason for the wide split is obviously to get under the bar, and the legs are spread instead of going into a quarter squat or half squat because (i) it is probably easier/more natural to do without practice and (ii) this style doesn't entail actually reversing directions and squatting DOWN under the bar, which is the proper way to do it if you have to. 

I am sure I have done something like this from time to time in the past when I am trying to catch the bar high (and therefore don't really initiate a squat phase) but I don't quite pull the bar high enough.  PR attempts aside, I personally believe it is preferable for a thrower to use slightly less weight and pull it high enough to catch on slightly bent legs or perhaps in a quarter squat.  The snatch can eitehr be done the same or caught in a jerk-depth split.  The wide lateral split should really be avoided.

As Josh noted and has been discussed before several times, I personally prefer to catch my lifts for the reasons mentioned, but many other very serious athletes have done otherwise.  The key is to be honest about bar height and bar speed vs. the weight lifted.

BTW, this is why I alway note HOW I do my lifts - catching a clean on "virtually straight legs" vs. "in a half squat" are quite different things with a given weight.



Thanks Peter, these were essentially my thoughts on it as well.  Catching the bar in a position that is actually athletic and useful on the field. 

Given that, these are lifts that I don't do, so I assume those that do them in this fashion have reasoning for it, but maybe not.  *shrug*
Back to Top
CHAD View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
Dangerously Anabolic

Joined: 2/04/05
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CHAD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:43am
Originally posted by C. Smith C. Smith wrote:

I understand that we all want to lift more weight, but if you're actually pulling something higher on a miss than a make, then wouldn't it be more beneficial to continue something like that?


I was just speaking to the above, duder.
Back to Top
Sean Betz View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

World Champ - ’08

Joined: 9/09/04
Status: Offline
Points: 1036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Betz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:44am

An interesting debate.  First off, I definitely see your point of the athletic stance comment.  It may be a bit of an ego thing as far as catching a big clean or snatch. But I don't know that the picture of Dan tells the whole story.  In picture 2,  Dan finishes the pull and catches the weight over his head.  From personal experience you need to pull longer to do so, than with a high pull.  I don't think this finish of the pull is captured in picture 2, but I may be wrong.  I don't think he drop squats under the weight, but continues to pull higher.  In picture 1. Dan gets a good high pull, but I think its because he is trying to snatch the weight.  I don't think it would be that high if he was just high-pulling it by intention.  This may sound ridiculous, but I know that I personally pull a weight higher when I'm trying to clean or snatch it, not just pull it.  I've tried pulls to a band height in a rack and they feel different and my training partners say that I don't pull as high.  So I think there is a big finish-pull element involved.  Here's is a video of Hossein Rezazedah jumping out wide with a big clean in a training hall video at 4:20 in the vid. So not just football guys and throwers do this.  I have seen this a number of times on training vids of great lifters. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMY6mxdP0MQ 

It is a real good question Craig.  Cleaning and Snatching this way may not be ideal for everyone.  I can safely say that I can hang clean 352 without a wide catch.  I know that my pull has improved by the way I almost knocked myself out with 308 under the chin, a few weeks ago.  That actually made me realize my pulling potential more than my near misses at 400.  Then again their are throwers out there that are doing no olympic type movements and are very explosive.  Many ways to rome.

Back to Top
Pingleton View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Highland Games' virtually straight legs

Joined: 11/28/06
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pingleton Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:45am
BTW, none of this diminishes the awesomeness of Dan's lifts at all.  He could probably hang clean 405 onto virtually straight legs or catch 415 in a quarter squat with just a bit of practice, if he felt like it.  I won't be doing either, ever!

We do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.



    - George Bernard Shaw



Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:45am
Originally posted by Josh Roslik Josh Roslik wrote:

Originally posted by C. Smith C. Smith wrote:

I understand that we all want to lift more weight, but if you're actually pulling something higher on a miss than a make, then wouldn't it be more beneficial to continue something like that?


I was just speaking to the above, duder.


You could have at least included the next sentence, lol.  
Back to Top
CHAD View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
Dangerously Anabolic

Joined: 2/04/05
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CHAD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:49am
They looked to be separate points.
Back to Top
Sean Betz View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

World Champ - ’08

Joined: 9/09/04
Status: Offline
Points: 1036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Betz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:49am
I need to type faster.  You guys posted twice before i could post.
Back to Top
CHAD View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
Dangerously Anabolic

Joined: 2/04/05
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CHAD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:50am
This is why you'll never be an elite athlete online.
Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 5:53am
Thanks Sean, and ya as one of those guys who doesn't do any oly lifts, it was just something that struck me as I watch you guys throw big weights around. 

And as stated, I only picked Dan cause he's the strongest, lol.  I wish I could do what he does.  His caber obviously tells the tale with regards to his power. 

I'm gonna go watch that Reza vid now, but I do know that his WR lift in Athens, if you watch the vid, his feet don't really move and barely leave the ground. 
Back to Top
Daniel McKim View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
World Champ - '11

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Daniel McKim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 6:18am
Work computer won't let me log on but I will give you my thoughts
tonight.
Back to Top
adam keep View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 8/13/10
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adam keep Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 6:54am
Originally posted by C. Smith C. Smith wrote:

Thanks Sean, and ya as one of those guys who doesn't do any oly lifts, it was just something that struck me as I watch you guys throw big weights around. 

And as stated, I only picked Dan cause he's the strongest, lol.  I wish I could do what he does.  His caber obviously tells the tale with regards to his power. 

I'm gonna go watch that Reza vid now, but I do know that his WR lift in Athens, if you watch the vid, his feet don't really move and barely leave the ground. 


Most oly lifters dont split much at all. My coach went on and on at me when my feet went much wider than shoulders. It was a safety thing, but it is also a better front squat position.
105kg pro strongman
Back to Top
Skullsplitter View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/29/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1047
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Skullsplitter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 1:44pm
If I may have a word here. Petur Gudmundsson and I were power
snatching a couple of years ago and I missed the goal weight for the
workout. I was really trying to keep everything in line with my Olympic
lifting background. Peter said, "Do what you have to do to get the weight
overhead. Catching a heavier weight is the goal." Well, I got a little more
fired and splayed my legs out a bit and caught the weight, to Petur's
approval. When someone like Petur tells you something like that, you have
to listen and consider the source.

So I guess in the end, if you can catch a heavier weight over head, then it
should give the training effect desired.

Thanks for letting me pitch a word in here.

Bill
"I am the thread, the pupil, and the eye of the needle is my teacher"
Back to Top
Daniel McKim View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
World Champ - '11

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Daniel McKim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/09/11 at 3:00pm

I think you have to look at this being a bad angle for the feet width: I know what you're talking about, and I've always been against a severly wide leg jump with the feet.  I've seen some really wide stances, and I am not overly wide (in comparison to many hang clean or snatch movements of other lifters).

That being said, let me breakdown my theory on cleans and snatches from the hang.  There are different phases (at least I believe) that make up a succesful clean or snatch.

1. Jump Shrug: This is the "pop" from the hips.  The EXPLOSION that makes these lifts so critical (I believe) for explosive abilities from the hips.  In the first picture, you labeled it as a "miss."  It was, but I honestly never got past this first phase.  I pulled it and popped it from my hips, but knew I wasn't going to be able to progress to the other phases, so I didn't continue my pull.  If you watch the video, you'll see me "give up" on the pull, and the "pop" from my hips carries the bar up fairly high (this, is a good sign for me, even if I knew I couldn't catch it).

2.  Next, at least for the snatch, is the movement needed to pull the bar back behind the head and above the shoulders.  This, is a reason I don't do high pulls; I want a long, fast, continuous pull; all the way through.  I'm not discrediting high pulls; some guys really like them and get a lot out of them, but my thought was always that if I'm going to pull it that "high," I might as well finish the lift and catch it.  So, that's the second phase.  The difference in the two pictures is that I was in this phase during that frame.

3.  Thirdly, to me, is the gather, "catch" and stand it up.  You can gather yourself, you can catch it, but it doesn't mean you'll always catch it.  You finish the throws, right? Then finish the whole lift. 

With that, and because of the movements we do, I do not do squat cleans or snatches; these are truly "Olympic lifts."  I don't ever pretend that I'm an Olympic lifter -- I want to be a powerful athlete and simply a strong dude.  I have miles to go to be both of those. 

If you watch video of an Olympic lifter, there's really no "jump shrug."  There's a deadlift, a gather, and then a massive front squat.  To me, these are very much different.  Watch a video, and you'll see that they only pull the bar high enough to get themselves under it to squat it up.  What I do, is different.  I want to pull the snot out of the bar by firing my hips and pulling hard.  If I can get an explosive "jump shrug," then I am doing my job.  None of our events are from the floor, and all of them are essentially fired from the hips to a level higher than the chest level. 

This, I believe, relates to the wide "leg spray."  I feel perfectly safe with my feet movements, and while I tried some split movements in college, I don't have any plans of doing them.  With all due respect to the people here that like them (which I will admit are smarter and know more about this than me), I am not comfortable with them and don't like how they transfer power in the movement.  Again, I see and understand their purpose, but they are just not for me at this time.

I've been doing hang cleans longer than I haven't.  I figured it up, I was first introduced and taught them 17 years ago.  I don't see the outward leg movement as a "detriment" or "unathletic position."  If we were to do that, we could breakdown a lot of lifts as unathletic positions and movements. 

It's as lifelong debate.  Craig, you don't do "olympic lifts," but are one of the most explosive athletes in our sport.  I am one of the few (perhaps only) who does absolutely NO Deads.  I think that's what is great about this; there's many ways to skin this cat.  You don't necessarily see the need for olympic movements, while I don't necessarily see the need for deadlifts.  Your squats are ridiculous, mine are, well, pedestrian at best.  Yet, I press quite often, and you do not.  Find your thing and go for it; that's what I've always told guys are starting up.  I think it's an interesting study; our career numbers are pretty equal.

So, as long as this is, that's my story!  I feel the "jump shrug" and hip pop is the most critical aspect of the lift, and probably the most critical aspect of my throwing.  I don't have the leg girth of half the guys here, but I hope to make up for it in explosive hips.  Hopefully that explains it better.  Also, for those interested, if you look at my current hang clean video, I do move my feet out.  That's how I plan it and how I move the weight; fast! 

Oh, and it's no ego thing.  I've grown to not care about how much other guys lift.  I love to see and here of guys moving big weights, but I know I am not the strongest guy, and neither will I ever be.  I surrendered that dream in about 7th grade. 

Just my thoughts and, like I said, there are much more credible guys in these things that have great insight (Sean, Josh, Peter, Bill, etc.).  I'm just a meathead, when you really boil it down. 

>Daniel

Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/10/11 at 12:50am
Thanks Dan, I'm glad to see that you have given this some thought.  

Originally posted by Daniel McKim Daniel McKim wrote:



I think you have to look at this being a bad angle for the feet width: I know what you're talking about, and I've always been against a severely wide leg jump with the feet.  I've seen some really wide stances, and I am not overly wide (in comparison to many hang clean or snatch movements of other lifters).


I think you might be underestimating how wide you really are.  Or maybe I'm overestimating.  Either way, you're comfortable with it so it doesn't matter.    


Originally posted by Daniel McKim Daniel McKim wrote:

If you watch video of an Olympic lifter, there's really no "jump shrug."  There's a deadlift, a gather, and then a massive front squat.  To me, these are very much different.  Watch a video, and you'll see that they only pull the bar high enough to get themselves under it to squat it up. 



I think your description of the oly lifts, particularly the triple extension, would make a lot of athletes and coaches cringe.  I'm also sure that you are underestimating how much "shrugging" is involved in a triple extension, notably the second pull.    


Originally posted by Daniel McKim Daniel McKim wrote:

With that, and because of the movements we do, I do not do squat cleans or snatches; these are truly "Olympic lifts."  I don't ever pretend that I'm an Olympic lifter



I also wasn't advocating that you switch to a split, or do squat cleans.  I was more advocating that you catch in a quarter squat, you know the same position that you pull caber/sheaf/wob in.  I would think the carry over would be more significant, and that was basically the reason for my post to begin with.  

I also didn't call you position a "detriment" or "unathletic".  Maybe you missed it, but I said MORE athletic.  Again, I'm arguing to get in the positions that you actually use on the field.  Just because something works doesn't mean it's the most optimal way to do it.  


Originally posted by Daniel McKim Daniel McKim wrote:

It's as lifelong debate.  Craig, you don't do "olympic lifts," but are one of the most explosive athletes in our sport.  I am one of the few (perhaps only) who does absolutely NO Deads.  I think that's what is great about this; there's many ways to skin this cat.  You don't necessarily see the need for olympic movements, while I don't necessarily see the need for deadlifts. 


I get lucky sometimes.  And for me, my training continues to evolve, I think I was just late to the party with most things.  The fact that I don't practice or lift to throw even, certainly has an effect on my training.    

Regarding your deads though, this has been a topic of discussion several times amongst a few pros.  The conclusion almost every time is that your WOB, while absolutely excellent in it's own right, lags behind your other events as a result of you not deadlifting.  Again, while I believe this to be true, I'm not the only one.  It's even been mentioned not to tell you this so you don't start doing them and raise the bar (pun intended), lol.  Since you said you don't see a need anyway, I suppose it's safe to tell you.  

Oh, and the ego thing wasn't in reference to you, just many of the football PC vid's that I've watched.  
Back to Top
CHAD View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
Dangerously Anabolic

Joined: 2/04/05
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CHAD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/10/11 at 2:23am
Sean,

In that clip Reza is doing ~80% of his max.  That's far different than landing wide at 95-100% intensity.

---------------------

There are two kinds of pullers in OWL.  

1.  Compact - examples include Kakhiashvili and many of the Chinese lifters.  Kahki doesn't come that close to a triple extension
2.  Explosive Overpullers - Vanev, Boeski, Sagir etc.  Lots of foot movement and a giant extension.

The way they train isn't ideal for throwing.  The jump shrug is a good move for strength training, but you're right, in OWL, the object is to get under the bar fast for an optimal "catch."  The catch allows you to use bar whip/oscillation to help bounce out of the hole.

I think landing in a quarter squat, over and over, is pretty much as bad for the patella and a wide split is for an ACL.

I think most people (and for the sake of argument, we'll include Dan as people) should have either the split or the squat clean in their back pocket when they are at 95% or more intensity.  That way you can put the risk back onto muscle and off of tendon and ligament.

(Sidebar, what's the difference between splitting wide and splitting front and back?)

When I max, nowadays, I split.  Used to squat.  But look at the monster Pole shot-putter who took gold at the last Olympics.  He's like 6'13" and HE can squat clean.

I just feel pretty strongly that splitting wide is a no-no.  And that there are safer, yet no less effective, options.

That's it.

Back to Top
Daniel McKim View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
World Champ - '11

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Daniel McKim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/10/11 at 2:40am
By no means am I saying Olympic lifters are not explosive ...
one look at their celebratory jumps will prove that! These guys
have hops! Maybe I described their sequence incorrectly; but I
wanted to clear that up so I didn't offend any Olympic lifters on
here. I still say these guys are the pure strongest people in the
world, in my opinion. Period. And since I do my movements
from a hang, I would never put me in the same conversation in
terms of explosive power as them. I just feel the hang
movements benefit me better than doing them from the floor,
especially for the caber, sheaf, and hammers.

Craig, I understand your opinion (and others) regarding
deadlifts for me. I'm guessing you mean my progression and
placing in other events in comparison to WOB? Is that correct?
I've hurt myself far too many times pulling things from the
floor (full power cleans since I was 12) and I even dabbled with
some deads back in 2006. Poor form and a weak low back
didn't prove for a successful endeavor. I've gone 17'1"
standing, and 17' other times, but last year was the first time in
four years I hadn't cleared 17' standing. Can't explain why.
Now, I know that is no where near the levels of the standers
like Zolk, Vincent, Betz, or yourself, but I hope to be at 17' with
you guys this year. I think my lag in WOB (in terms of placing)
also comes from the fact that I don't spin. Maybe, I'll give it a
try this year. It sure would have helped me at the Celtic this
year.

While I haven't added deads this offseason, I have included a
lot more posterior leg work in the form of glutehams and
straight leg deads. I spent sometime this offseason thinking
about what things I was doing when I hit 17'1" and 17' at
games in 2007, 2008, and 2009. I couldn't understand how I
could do heavier front squats, hang cleans, hang snatches and
be just overall stronger, and not get in sync at 17'. While I
didn't do deads, I was doing a lot of back hyperextensions. So,
this offseason I put a focus on my posterior legs and low back
with the gluteham, back hypers, straight leg deads, etc. I also, I
guess you could say, do "rack deads" when I shrug. I usually
pull my shrugs off the rack just above the knee. Again, this
nowhere near a dead, and I don't pretend it to be. So, with
these adaptations to my workout, we'll see how the year goes!
Maybe it will translate well. I hear you on all accounts, and
appreciate the input. I still feel and see the value in the way I
lift, so I will proceed as I have in the past. We just won't agree
on everything as our philosophies on training are different.
That's fine with me. There are many ways to be a more
explosive and successful thrower. I feel we both prove it can
be done different ways.

Josh is a very well versed Olympic lifter and makes some great
points. For sure!
Back to Top
Pingleton View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Highland Games' virtually straight legs

Joined: 11/28/06
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pingleton Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/10/11 at 2:53am

Craig,

Given how strong Dan is at the dynamic hang lifts, and the fact that he is also including lots of front squats and supplemental posterior chain work (as outlined above), what do you think adding full deadlifts is going to give him for an event like the WOB?  If anything, don't you think he should continue really pushing his Front Squats, which, relatively speaking of course, lag quite a bit behind his dynamic pulls?


We do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.



    - George Bernard Shaw



Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/10/11 at 3:12am
Dan - yea, that's exactly what I was saying.  I suspect that your additional posterior chain work will make a difference.  And please don't throw me in there with the big standers, my WOB sucks, lol. 

And I agree that most of us won't agree on one training methodology, but these discussions are fun

Peter - see above.  I think what he is doing will have a positive impact.  Do I think that could be done another way?  Of course I do.  Who is right?  Both or neither of us probably.   

This came up most recently regarding Dan when I was talking to John Gallagher, who noted that the only season he had a big standing wob, 17'6", was when he was doing heavy deadlifts.  I know the same can be said for KO, Myles, and Valenti as well. 

As much as you would like to see me add oly lifts in my programming Peter, I would like to see you get up to a 600lbs deadlift and see what it does to your throwing.  We both can dream i suppose




Back to Top
Pingleton View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Highland Games' virtually straight legs

Joined: 11/28/06
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pingleton Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/10/11 at 3:17am

Originally posted by C. Smith C. Smith wrote:

As much as you would like to see me add oly lifts in my programming Peter, I would like to see you get up to a 500lbs deadlift and see what it does to your throwing.  We both can dream i suppose

fyp Craig.

It could happen!


We do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.



    - George Bernard Shaw



Back to Top
Pingleton View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Highland Games' virtually straight legs

Joined: 11/28/06
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pingleton Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/10/11 at 4:52am

BTW, given his fondness for "power training", and his history as a very strong guy who included deadlifts in his training and found them to be useful, maybe Gallagher can give us his thoughts on the matter. 

Anyone else too of course!


We do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.



    - George Bernard Shaw



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.11
Copyright ©2001-2012 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.