![]() |
Database ![]() |
"Squatting and Peaking" |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: "Squatting and Peaking"Posted: 11/03/07 at 6:22am |
|
Another post copied from The Ring, where there have been some interesting and informed points made recently. For those who don't know, Ron was twice a World Masters Heavy Events Champion and previously an excellent shot putter for his stature who trained with several legendary throwers. Ron, if you are reading this, I hope you approve of me using your post.
|
|
![]() |
|
C. Smith
Admin Group
Retired Joined: 8/30/04 Location: Antarctica Status: Offline Points: 6661443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/03/07 at 7:47am |
|
I couldn't agree more with this (esp the part i put in red). |
|
![]() |
|
Roy Bogue
Postaholic
Joined: 8/30/04 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2918 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/03/07 at 7:54am |
|
mind over matter. it works.
|
|
|
Donate lately?
|
|
![]() |
|
buckcali
Senior Member
Joined: 9/01/07 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/03/07 at 12:36pm |
|
Great post peter...100% agree I was one who changed everything for the sceince... then stop and look @ what I was doing... now I am back to what I beleive will improve me and hopefully result in a better athlete Buck
|
|
![]() |
|
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/04/07 at 2:47pm |
|
Another experienced viewpoint from The Ring, this time from "70 Footer". Again, this is with respect to T&F throwing, specifically shot putting, so things might be a little different for HG throwers. when I came up I was told that if I squated 500 lbs , and if I could pull 300lbs , and bench 400lbs then I could throw 60 feet , then later if I wanted to throw 70 feet i would have to bench X and squat X, and so on.
|
|
![]() |
|
C. Smith
Admin Group
Retired Joined: 8/30/04 Location: Antarctica Status: Offline Points: 6661443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/04/07 at 4:19pm |
bwahahahahahahahahah! Surely you don't believe that Cantwell can only squat 400???????? |
|
![]() |
|
C. Smith
Admin Group
Retired Joined: 8/30/04 Location: Antarctica Status: Offline Points: 6661443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/04/07 at 4:21pm |
|
Really? Just coincidence then that MANY of the top shot putters were/are MUCH stonger than that? |
|
![]() |
|
big MAC
Postaholic
Joined: 1/05/05 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 1231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/04/07 at 4:26pm |
|
I've got a video of Cantwell squatting 562lbs for a double, wasn't easy for him, but looked good for 600 at least. Either way, he spins really upright with a 600lb bench and good rhythm, the squat is hardly important for him.
|
|
![]() |
|
C. Smith
Admin Group
Retired Joined: 8/30/04 Location: Antarctica Status: Offline Points: 6661443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/05/07 at 1:33am |
|
That i can believe. 600 lbs is a long way from 400 lbs. |
|
![]() |
|
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11/05/07 at 1:46am |
|
Craig, I wasn't necessarily adopting this post as my position, just putting it out there for discussion and consideration (for example, I know Cantwell squats a lot more than 400, but I am not sure if he squats much more than he can bench, not that it matters much with his technique). And while I agree that the squat number is too low, and that many top shot putters can bench more, I still think his more general point is valid, namely that after a certain level of strength has been attained, which will vary from athletes to athlete, other factors become more important for throwing success. If this were not true to a large extent, then, with some basic qualifications, the stronger thrower would always win, which is definitely not the case. This leads to a point or rather a question I have been alluding to but not actually addressing over the past week or so: While a big deadlift seems to be a big factor for some guys, and some excellent throwers have huge deadlifts (you, KO, Myles, 17/20, etc.), to what extent is the big deadlift directly responsible vs. the fact that a big enough deadlift inevitably translates into a high level of throwing power, which might be able to be developed in other (perhaps more efficient) ways? In other words, it might not be the 700+ dead, but rather that this level of basic strength results in the power to do a high pull from your knees to your chest with the amount of weight necessary to throw far. Other athletes with similar results might train using dynamic pulls of some type and pull the same amount to their chest but be able to deadlift far less. Just a thought.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |