![]() |
Database ![]() |
Jump Squats - Technique and Advice |
Post Reply
|
| Author | ||
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Jump Squats - Technique and AdvicePosted: 1/11/08 at 5:39am |
|
|
The following is taken from an article written by Jud Logan, an Olympian and former American record holder in the hammer throw and a VERY strong and explosive athlete (440 power clean, 770 Back Squat, and 550 x 3 Front Squat). "On the jump squats, the key is to have the elbows under the bar pointing straight down (good power line). Next the athlete squats into what I call a high 1/2 squat position, and attempts to drive the feet through the floor in a violent change of direction--- try to reach maximum height each jump (I tell my athletes to feel sensation of reaching for the ceiling w/ their head, and to point the toes down on lift off). Keep the bar tight to the traps and upon landing repeat w/out pause. When done correctly it looks like weighted hopping in place. Remember this is more plyometrics and a stimuli for the nervous system to prepare the fast twitch muscle fibers to fire! Again, I used 110 lbs, I had my all-american (207) use 40 k or 88 lbs, on his way to a 150k (330) clean @ a BW of 210. Hope this gives you some guidelines." Keep in mind that Jud was doing 3x20 with that weight. I have read variously that one should use anywhere from 20-30% of one's max Olympic squat, 30% of one's bodyweight, or 40% of one's max power snatch when doing jump squats. Of course, it depends if you are doing 3x20 or 3x5. The Soviets advocated 3-4 sets of 3-6 reps for their weightlifters, using 20% of their max C&J (see below). So 20% of one's max front squat might be ideal for most individuals. Very significantly, it is commonly advised that you do not do jump squats at all until you can Back Squat 1.5x your bodyweight, or if you have any knee or back problems. If you do choose to include these in your program, start very light and progress slowly. An interesting point: Soviet researchers determined that the test that had the highest correlation to the performance of highly-trained Olympic lifters in the Clean & Jerk was the height achieved by the lifter in a single jumpsquat with 50% of the lifter's bodyweight. The following is taken from "The Training of the Weightlifter", 2nd edition, by R.A. Roman-Fizkultura i spvt Publishers, Moscow, 1986: "It has already been pointed out that it is necessary to display force quickly when executing the clean (and especially in the snatch and the jerk). If one compares results in the clean and jerk with results in jumping (without weight), then one finds that there is no correlation whatsoever, between them. However, a comparison of results in the clean and jerk with the results in jumping with 50% of bodyweight reveals: that athletes who jump the highest, generally jerk more. In other words, there is a correlation (moderate) between jumping height and results in the clean and jerk. Furthermore, not all athletes who have stronger legs (higher results in the back squat), have higher results in jumping with 50% of bodyweight, i.e., the correlation between the jumping and the squat is weak. For example, David Rigert (90-100 kg class) jumped 59 cm with 50% of bodyweight; Pavel Kuznyetsov (100 kg) --62 cm; Yuri Vardanyan (82.5 kg)-- 65 cm."
|
||
![]() |
||
Greg Hadley
Postaholic
Joined: 12/27/04 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1142 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 1/11/08 at 11:16am |
|
|
How big was Logan when he hit those ridiculous lifts? Those numbers are some mind blowing stuff.
|
||
![]() |
||
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 1/11/08 at 11:26am |
|
|
I believe he was in the 275-285 range.
|
||
![]() |
||
Greg Hadley
Postaholic
Joined: 12/27/04 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1142 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 1/14/08 at 11:05am |
|
|
I still can't get over those numbers.
|
||
![]() |
||
Coach Mac
Senior Member
Joined: 9/01/04 Status: Offline Points: 889 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 1/17/08 at 9:23am |
|
|
Greg...I could find out from Jud but I belive his bodyweight was closer too
255-lbs. (20-25 -lbs HUGE difference) We had Harry McDonald (multiple time Canadien Champ and a BEAST) down going to school and training in Calif for a year and he went 28-inch VJ at 312 or 315 (?) bodyweight. I was on the downhill slide at the time with a best VJ /BW of 36" at 255-lbs. 1979- PRE bullet holes) and I was in the 32" x 278.lb shape at the time You do the math in terms of POWER equation...LOL We needed a calculator and I think Harry went 5-6 more attempts trying to get the hors-power higher. I'll write up what is REALLY going on (science = facts ) this weekend when I have more time- THROW FAR and move FAST !!! |
||
|
Have a GREAT Day !
Rob " Coach Mac " Mac Kay |
||
![]() |
||
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 1/17/08 at 11:38am |
|
|
Coach Mac, as I had simply noted these figures off the top of my head, I went back to some source material: - From "Explosive Leg Strength" by Louie Simmons: "My friend Jud Logan, a four-time Olympian in the hammer throw, was very strong and very explosive. His stats were as follows: 478 raw bench, 770 squat, 550 x 5 and 600 x 1 front squat, and 440 power clean. Like myself, in the 1980s his top strength grew but his throws stagnated. Some of his East German friends suggested he push his box jumps up. As he improved to 5 jumps on a 52-inch box and a single jump on a 56-inch box at about 275 pounds body weight, his throws began increasing." - from www.usatf.org: JUD LOGAN In the 2005 NTCA video on Macthrow featuring Jud, he specifically notes that he weighed 255 - in 1981, when he was throwing 60m - but that by 1984 he weighed 268 and threw 74.44m, and he clearly implies that he got a bit bigger and stronger by the time he threw 81.88m in 1988, when he presumably weighed 275. Jud's lifting results were impressive enough at 275 and seem unlikely for a 6'4" tall thrower weighing just 255. Let us know if you find out anything different. As always, I am looking forward to your upcoming posts.
|
||
![]() |
||
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/25/08 at 3:24am |
|
|
I had forgotten about the post below, which is from Jud Logan himself. I think it is a worthwhile addition, although it would probably more useful in a different thread. It is also worth noting that while Logan's competitive PR in the back squat with belt, suit, and knee wraps to just below parallel was 770, he has noted that his best true high-bar Olympic squat was 'only' 660 and that after 1990, he never squatted over 500. In the same interview, he noted that it would have been "impossible" to maintain a huge back squat and throw far. This is an interesting comment given his experience and is probably worthy of consideration. The same would probably be true of his belief that the most important lifts for (hammer?) throwers are the clean-grip snatch and the front squat. This brings up something else that might be worth noting - strength PRs and throwing PRs aren't necessarily made in the same year, much less the same month. In his introductory commments in articles and interviews, Jud often highlights his 770 back squat, which I believe was done some time in the mid-1980s, but he often doesn't go on to provide the complete story as noted above, which is arguably much more relevant. The same thing is true for numerous other throwers, with John Powell being a well-known example. Powell's best training bench was about 450 back in the 1970's when he threw 226', but was apparantly only 290 in 1984 when he threw 233'. Although Powell's earlier lift would certainly be much more typical for a world-class discus thrower, this example is, as Coach Mac likes to say, food for thought.
|
||
![]() |
||
Coach Mac
Senior Member
Joined: 9/01/04 Status: Offline Points: 889 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/25/08 at 7:43am |
|
|
In any discussion on strength and power you should FACTOR in the enhancement issue if your looking for factual information. Jud served a suspension in 1992 for Clembutrol from Barcelona :http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE7DA143E F934A3575BC0A964958260 so you math guys do your adding and subtraction ( bodyweight and max lifts) and plus or minus the 10-30% and you see a diffferent picture. |
||
|
Have a GREAT Day !
Rob " Coach Mac " Mac Kay |
||
![]() |
||
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/25/08 at 8:28am |
|
|
Coach Mac, I don't mean to be either obtuse or disagreeable, but I am not exactly sure what your point is. Is that that Jud's lifts were more impressive than they might otherwise have been? Agreed . That his throwing results were better than they might otherwise have been given his technique? Agreed (although I believe the generally agreed upon range is about 10-12% - the actual benefit to any athlete probably depends on several factors. Even 10% is still very significant - 8m off of 80m). Sadly, these caveats probably apply to most top throwers, at least from the past (so they say, right???). The reason I noted Jud's numbers was more for the ratios of the various lifts and because some of his examples require this information for context. Regardless of this fact, Jud still has a lot of knowledge and experience that is worth taking into consideration.
|
||
![]() |
||
david barron
Senior Member
Joined: 9/20/04 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 800 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/25/08 at 8:32am |
|
|
Average joe
|
||
![]() |
||
S McCracken
Postaholic
Craig Smith Fan Club Joined: 9/18/07 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1802 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/25/08 at 9:59am |
|
|
How can we be sure he didnt have asma?
|
||
|
North American Highlander Ohio Chair
www.nahighlander.com |
||
![]() |
||
Coach Mac
Senior Member
Joined: 9/01/04 Status: Offline Points: 889 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/25/08 at 5:44pm |
|
Peter and ANY intrested reader...first off I not only have worked Juds camp I consider him to be a friend and professional associate. I steered Kibwe Johnson to him....enough said on that ! That being said..if you read the article (and personal conversations with a lot of throwers from that era) they looked for ANY edge and un-fortuneatly at ANY cost...sterility...and death ...no news there !
My POINT is this...do these guys and there training have any validity ...YES Should you try to duplicate it...NO
I see young guys coming up every year looking for an edge and a path. They need be aware of WHAT was going on then and not too end there careers or set themselves up too fail pushing themselves through enhanced programs. I must add that if you have a "who cares" attitude about supplementing and training/Highland Games then this is VALUBALE information. I'm trying to shed some light on Gregs original question just like I did for a under-sized ( 195-lb freshman) named Ryan Vierra back in the late 1980's....LOL |
||
|
Have a GREAT Day !
Rob " Coach Mac " Mac Kay |
||
![]() |
||
Duncan McCallum
Postaholic
Joined: 12/07/07 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/27/08 at 3:43pm |
|
|
Gentlemen, For the sake of argument, is there a formula/ratio for what someone with no knee/back/ankle problems should load their bar with? Should the focus be on quick explosion, with 135 lbs, perhaps, with higher reps...or would it be more beneficial to engage a heavier weight which would almost inevitably curtail some of that explosion in favor of poundage? I am looking to pull these out of the toolbox, and am looking for a little guidance. Or a lot! Respectfully, Duncan McCallum |
||
![]() |
||
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/27/08 at 4:04pm |
|
|
Duncan, Copied directly from the article above: "Again, I used 110 lbs, I had my all-american (207) use 40 k or 88 lbs, on his way to a 150k (330) clean @ a BW of 210. Hope this gives you some guidelines." Keep in mind that Jud was doing 3x20 with that weight. I have read variously that one should use anywhere from 20-30% of one's max Olympic squat, 30% of one's bodyweight, or 40% of one's max power snatch when doing jump squats. Of course, it depends if you are doing 3x20 or 3x5. The Soviets advocated 3-4 sets of 3-6 reps for their weightlifters, using 20% of their max C&J (see below). So 20% of one's max front squat might be ideal for most individuals. Very significantly, it is commonly advised that you do not do jump squats at all until you can Back Squat 1.5x your bodyweight, or if you have any knee or back problems. If you do choose to include these in your program, start very light and progress slowly.
|
||
![]() |
||
Duncan McCallum
Postaholic
Joined: 12/07/07 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/27/08 at 4:08pm |
|
|
Peter, Currently I am 2x bodyweight...are you an advocate for higher reps? Thanks for pointing that out...must have been looking right at it. Respectfully, Duncan McCallum |
||
![]() |
||
Pingleton
Postaholic
Highland Games' virtually straight legs Joined: 11/28/06 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2/27/08 at 4:26pm |
|
|
Duncan, Regarding reps, from what I have learned it would depend on whether you are using the exercise to "stimulate the CNS" as Jud was doing (before power cleans) or as an exercise to develop power and explosiveness, in which case I believe the Russian routine would make much more sense.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |